Re: Re: php framework vs just php?

From: Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 01:32:10 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: php framework vs just php?
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-273508@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 16:50 -0500, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
    
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 19:05 -0500, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Tony Marston wrote:
""Jay Blanchard"" <jblanchard@pocket.com> wrote in message news:9F6B7518E92167499E0168D01C2D8D9C41755B@YGEX01WAL.onecall.local...
[snip]
          
You haven't answered the question. Where can this piece of wizardry be
downloaded so that it can be reviewed by your peers?
              
[/snip]
          
It is not available for download
So your claims cannot be substantiated by anyone in this group.
          
but it has been reviewed by peers on
several project teams who have used it. It was developed specifically for a company who owns the work product. I have not re-created for general use by mere mortals but I will soon.
            Let me know when as I could do with a good laugh.
          Well, if you would take the time to individually download > 1,000 classes and piece them together you may find a very feature rich framework: http://www.phpclasses.org.  Or maybe meta storage http://www.meta-language.net/metastorage.html.
        Or you may find you've got >999 classes of code you'll never use :) That
would be one hell of an undertaking to piece them together. I'm going to guess you'll need namespaces too since I bet some of them step on each other's toes. Cheers, Rob.
      Obviously not a very good one, but that was in the spirit of a joke.  ;-)
    
I took it that way :) Cheers, Rob. Then say haha, not a long dissection of how sorry and shitty my post was :-) -Shawn

« previous php.general (#273508) next »