Re: Re: anchor name on URL

On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 19:01 -0500, Daniel P. Brown wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Ashley Sheridan > <ash@ashleysheridan.co.uk> wrote: > >> > > Don't forget Konqueror in that list ;) It's not exactly the same engine > > after Apple forked it from KHTML, but it's quite close, and both > > Konqueror and Safari are said to be working a little more closely than > > before to share the work done to the rendering engines since the fork. > > A few years ago, that was the only browser I'd use for web > surfing. I'm honestly not sure where it's market share is now, but > I'd guess only in the 1% range. It's a shame.... it's a viable player > on the field. > > -- > </Daniel P. Brown> > http://www.parasane.net/ > daniel.brown@parasane.net || danbrown@php.net > Ask me about our current hosting/dedicated server deals! > Now I tend only to use it now for file management, FTP and testing websites. Ash www.ashleysheridan.co.uk