Re: Re: anchor name on URL

Nathan Rixham wrote: > Per Jessen wrote: >> Nathan Rixham wrote: >> >>> i never understand this, if i was makign a browser I'd be "where's >>> the rfc's" then code it to implement those rfc's - why people choose >>> not to is beyond me? >> >> World domination is part of the reasoning ... >> >> >> /Per Jessen, Zürich >> > > well that bubble should have popped.. > > from some of my sites: > Browser % visits > Firefox 88.43% > Internet Explorer 9.99% > > Firefox 46.89% > Internet Explorer 37.66% > Opera 7.36% > Safari 5.39% > Chrome 2.17% > > Firefox 46.80% > Internet Explorer 42.45% > Safari 5.36% > Opera 3.07% > Mozilla 1.22% I have not looked at any of my own stats for quite a while, but yours are just too good to be true :-) /Per Jessen, Zürich