Re: Re: anchor name on URL
| From: | Nathan Rixham | Date: | Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:42:40 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: anchor name on URL | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-283521@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Per Jessen wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:they're all music sites for the above.. site 1 = trance news, charts etc site 2 = radio station site 3 = mp3 download site was suprised myself the stats are inline with my techy sites which consitently sit around 60% firefox, 25% iePer Jessen wrote:I have not looked at any of my own stats for quite a while, but yours are just too good to be true :-) /Per Jessen, ZürichNathan Rixham wrote:well that bubble should have popped.. from some of my sites: Browser % visitsi never understand this, if i was makign a browser I'd be "where's the rfc's" then code it to implement those rfc's - why people choose not to is beyond me?World domination is part of the reasoning ... /Per Jessen, ZürichFirefox 88.43%Internet Explorer 9.99%Firefox 46.89%Internet Explorer 37.66% Opera 7.36% Safari 5.39% Chrome 2.17% Firefox 46.80% Internet Explorer 42.45% Safari 5.36% Opera 3.07% Mozilla 1.22%