RE: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL

> -----Original Message----- > From: Ashley Sheridan [mailto:ash@ashleysheridan.co.uk] > Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 1:43 PM > To: Boyd, Todd M. > Cc: PHP General Mailing List > Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL > ---8<--- > > > Don't forget Konqueror in that list ;) It's not exactly the same > > engine > > > after Apple forked it from KHTML, but it's quite close, and both > > > Konqueror and Safari are said to be working a little more closely > than > > > before to share the work done to the rendering engines since the > fork. > > > > > > I'm waiting for the day when Firefox starts using Google's V8 > > scripting > > > engine! > > > > Firefox will probably go with their own improvements a la Minefield > > (instead of V8). As for WebKit, I think you guys are forgetting--it's > an > > APPLE product. Do you seriously think they're going to let Microsoft > use > > it in their web browser after they've hacked it to pieces and strung > it > > back together into some bloated, inefficient monster? > > > > Well... maybe if the price is right. > > > The Webkist engine afaik is licensed under the GPL, because of the use > of the code from the original KHTML. I'm not sure how this fits with M$ > proprietary plan however... On that note... they're bringing jQuery (OSS Javascript framework) into the ASP.NET paradigm UNALTERED! That's right--they've admitted that they can't do better than the jQuery folks, and they're going to adopt it AS-IS. That made me very excited... especially since I've recently fallen in love with jQuery, and I am forced to use ASP.NET at work (though, to the chagrin of this list, I will admit: I like the .NET framework. A lot). Anyway, just thought I'd put the idea out there that not every person at Microsoft follows the "find idea, FUBAR idea, repackage idea" mindset. :) Their ASP.NET/VS crew has actually been pretty forward-thinking as of late. *cough* ... but, you know... PHP rules, too, and junk. // Todd