Re: Re: anchor name on URL

Ashley Sheridan wrote: > On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 23:51 +0000, Richard Heyes wrote: > >>> Yeah, but it will mean that there will still be about 3 different >>> rendering versions of IE out there by the time it comes out; 7, 8 and 9 >>> (I'm fairly sure 6 will have gone to that good ol' web in the sky by >>> that time) >>> >> Sure, but depending on how closely it follows WebKit, could make >> testing on IE9, Safari and Chrome a breeze. >> >> -- >> Richard Heyes > Don't forget Konqueror in that list ;) It's not exactly the same engine > after Apple forked it from KHTML, but it's quite close, and both > Konqueror and Safari are said to be working a little more closely than > before to share the work done to the rendering engines since the fork. > > I'm waiting for the day when Firefox starts using Google's V8 scripting > engine! > > > Ash > I'd rather all the engines follow the W3C standards so that you just have to make sure your web page is compliant. Thank you, Micah Gersten onShore Networks Internal Developer http://www.onshore.com