That "kewl" script : To CSS or not to CSS

I'm not sure going to CSS is worth much...in terms of speed. Sure you may generate less HTML, but the rendering speed in the browser gets drastically cut down. At least, in every environment and machines that I have, it did. Using the (now depreciated)<font> tag was by far the fastest, but as soon as I switch to CSS, whether at the top of the document, or in the HTML itself, the rendering time just crawled. I realize this has nothing to do with how fats the script generates the HTML, or how much of it gets generated, but still. Having some very slow rendition of an image in text isn't going to appeal to anyone, I don't think. -- W | I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere. +-------------------------------------------------------------------- Ashley M. Kirchner <mailto:ashley@pcraft.com> . 303.442.6410 x130 IT Director / SysAdmin / WebSmith . 800.441.3873 x130 Photo Craft Laboratories, Inc. . 3550 Arapahoe Ave. #6 http://www.pcraft.com ..... . . . Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A.