Re: php pulling info from other sites
| From: | R. P. Channing Rodgers, M.D. | Date: | Thu, 20 Jul 2000 22:23:36 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: php pulling info from other sites | ||
| Groups: | php.general | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-7486@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
You'd have to ask a real intellectual property rights lawyer about this,
but I suspect that the originator could indeed claim that the list of
URLs that its search engine finds constitutes intellectual property,
and that unauthorized copying could be illegal. This may be a right
that most search companies forego voluntarily, or perhaps simply realize
is not worth the trouble to enforce...
Cheerio, Rick Rodgers
> From slogan@stephenlogan.com Thu Jul 20 18:01:58 2000
> Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 17:03:23 +0000 (CDT)
> From: Stephen Logan <slogan@stephenlogan.com>
> To: "R. P. Channing Rodgers, M.D." <rodgers@nlm.nih.gov>
> Subject: Re: [PHP] php pulling info from other sites
>
> In my case I wasn't asking about pulling news stories or any other content
> owned by the search engine. I would only be pulling the results of a
> search and reformating them to be displayed on another site. Is this not
> how all the meta search engines work? I don't think the search engine
> owns the links it has stored. What about pulling the results from a meta
> search engine?
>
> --
> S t e p h e n L o g a n
> slogan@stephenlogan.com
>
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, R. P. Channing Rodgers, M.D. wrote:
>
> > > MIME-Version: 1.0
> > > Subject: Re: [PHP] php pulling info from other sites
> > >
> > > What about using php to send a query to a search engine and then parsing
> > > the results and displaying them on your site? Would this be considered
> > > copyright infringement? Anyone have any opinions on this?
> > >
> > > --
> > > S t e p h e n L o g a n
> > > slogan@stephenlogan.com
> >
> > Copyright applies to intellectual property -- in the case of writing,
> > it's the *language* that is copyrighted, not the format in which it is
> > presented. Additionally, although it is
> > considered best form to apply the standard copyright notice to
> > materials ("Copyright 2000 John Doe, All Rights Reserved"), there is
> > an implicit copyright for the author even if she/he does not do so.
> > So reuse of online news feeds in the manner you describe would be a
> > copyright infringement unless the originator specifically
> > allows you to do this...
> >
> > Cheerio, Rick Rodgers
> >
>
>