Re: Enums, flags and ::
| From: | Madeleine D. | Date: | Tue, 25 Oct 2005 18:12:03 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Enums, flags and :: | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.gtk.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-gtk-dev+get-1942@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Steph -
I hit the same thing on my upgrade attempt.
Christian's right, in that I see so much that needs to be changed already,
the Enums/Flags would be just one more thing to do. Since I've got about
40k of code, that's no small thing, but it's not fatal either.
My question is: why do they need to change? What is being gained here?
Madeleine D.
At 04:50 PM 10/25/05 +0100, Steph Fox wrote:
>Before it's too late (assuming it isn't already): Is there any way we can
>return enums/flags to the standard GTK format, as they were in PHP-GTK 1?
>
>If you remember that far back, I spent more than a day trying to work out
>what I was doing wrong when every enum in sight failed in an old script I
>upgraded to PHP-GTK 2. I don't think I'm going to be the only scriptkiddie
>baffled by that change.
>
>It's also the one area Christian and I can't come to an agreement over in
>our coding standards discussions, because what _should_ be a constant is
>being treated as some kind of a pseudo-method, which makes either approach
>inconsistent by definition.
>
>I know it'd be a BC breakage for PHP-GTK 2 to change this now, but then
>again we haven't released v. 2 yet. At present it's a BC breakage for
>PHP-GTK 1, which is probably more serious.
>
>So the question is, do enums and flags _have_ to be registered as class
>entry constants for ZE 2 to deal with them? Or is it just a matter of
>convenience?
>
>- and the next question is, assuming it's possible to register them as
>global constants, should we?
>
>- Steph
>
>--
>PHP-GTK Development Mailing List (http://gtk.php.net/)
>To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>