Re: Enums, flags and ::
| From: | Steph Fox | Date: | Tue, 25 Oct 2005 19:13:36 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Enums, flags and :: | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.gtk.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-gtk-dev+get-1946@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I know. It's going to have to be one of the things highlighted in the
release notes.
nm.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Madeleine D." <mmdrake@bctonline.com>
To: "Steph Fox" <steph@zend.com>; "Andrei" <andrei@gravitonic.com>
Cc: "PHP-GTK dev" <php-gtk-dev@lists.php.net>
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 8:11 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-GTK-DEV] Enums, flags and ::
> S -
>
> It will also be a bit of a thrower when you try to use Gtk+
docs/tutorials,
> etc, which most of us do.
>
> Madeleine D.
>
>
> At 07:30 PM 10/25/05 +0100, Steph Fox wrote:
> >Hi Madeleine,
> >
> >It's down to PHP 5/Zend Engine 2's object support. We didn't have this
in
> >PHP 4, so the bindings were made via GtkEnumType and we had the same
syntax
> >as in GTK+.
> >
> >Basically all it means is that something like, say, GTK_WIN_POS_MOUSE, is
> >now registered as a constant named WIN_POS_MOUSE within a
zend_class_entry
> >struct named GTK.
> >
> >I have to say it makes absolute sense to do it this way from an internals
> >perspective - much cleaner, and probably faster when it comes to
lookups -
> >it's just a bit of a thrower on the user side.
> >
> >- Steph
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Madeleine D." <mmdrake@bctonline.com>
> >To: "Steph Fox" <steph@zend.com>; "Andrei"
> ><andrei@gravitonic.com>
> >Cc: "PHP-GTK dev" <php-gtk-dev@lists.php.net>
> >Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 7:12 PM
> >Subject: Re: [PHP-GTK-DEV] Enums, flags and ::
> >
> >
> >> Steph -
> >>
> >> I hit the same thing on my upgrade attempt.
> >>
> >> Christian's right, in that I see so much that needs to be changed
already,
> >> the Enums/Flags would be just one more thing to do. Since I've got
about
> >> 40k of code, that's no small thing, but it's not fatal either.
> >>
> >> My question is: why do they need to change? What is being gained here?
> >>
> >> Madeleine D.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> At 04:50 PM 10/25/05 +0100, Steph Fox wrote:
> >> >Before it's too late (assuming it isn't already): Is there any way we
can
> >> >return enums/flags to the standard GTK format, as they were in PHP-GTK
1?
> >> >
> >> >If you remember that far back, I spent more than a day trying to work
out
> >> >what I was doing wrong when every enum in sight failed in an old
script I
> >> >upgraded to PHP-GTK 2. I don't think I'm going to be the only
> >scriptkiddie
> >> >baffled by that change.
> >> >
> >> >It's also the one area Christian and I can't come to an agreement over
in
> >> >our coding standards discussions, because what _should_ be a constant
is
> >> >being treated as some kind of a pseudo-method, which makes either
> >approach
> >> >inconsistent by definition.
> >> >
> >> >I know it'd be a BC breakage for PHP-GTK 2 to change this now, but
then
> >> >again we haven't released v. 2 yet. At present it's a BC breakage for
> >> >PHP-GTK 1, which is probably more serious.
> >> >
> >> >So the question is, do enums and flags _have_ to be registered as
class
> >> >entry constants for ZE 2 to deal with them? Or is it just a matter of
> >> >convenience?
> >> >
> >> >- and the next question is, assuming it's possible to register them as
> >> >global constants, should we?
> >> >
> >> >- Steph
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >PHP-GTK Development Mailing List (http://gtk.php.net/)
> >> >To unsubscribe, visit:
> >> >http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> PHP-GTK Development Mailing List (http://gtk.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>