Re: [RFC] Reclassifying engine warnings

From: Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:02:57 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] Reclassifying engine warnings
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-107062@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
> Why? If "assume $key2 exists as a key and is an integer" is so bad that PHP should > halt my program, why should "assume $key1 exists and is an array" > be perfectly OK? Warning is triggered by reading non-existing key, not assigning value to it. In $foo[$key1][$key2] ??= 0 you never try to read non-existing key. > Please can you show me a bug that adding this line has avoided? I don't doubt that the > same warning saves bugs in other scenarios, but in this > scenario, the logic is unambiguous, and any additions are just to suppress unnecessary errors. Well, then let's say that it is "lesser evil" - one additional line is better than ignoring reading uninitialized values. And IMO it is not a "problem" that would justify introducing special syntax for saving one line in such niche case. Regards, Robert Korulczyk

« previous php.internals (#107062) next »