Re: Request for karma to vote on RFCs

Den man. 19. jul. 2021 kl. 12.11 skrev Lynn <kjarli@gmail.com>: > I fully agree with this, as a developer I do not want to worry about low level php changes that > do not directly impact me. Therefore I think that people who do get impacted by this (for example > open-source package managers), at least get a vote in these changes. It's unfair to put the > burden of writing abstractions on someone and then tell them they don't get a say in making > their lives easier or more difficult. Why is it then fair to give them voting rights if they only contribute their vote but not words before hand? Why is it only possible to give feedback in terms of a +1 or -1 and not feedback in text form? Because if its only possible in that way, it makes me think that it is purely a PR thing which makes me worry that the power vested into the voter may not be just. Why is there no dialogs from their side on internals with problems they may have with directions? So far I do see a few faces from the community like representives static analyzers, Nicolas Grekas and Marco Pivetta to name some who actively takes part of the challenges at hand and even actively runs RFCs on their own with implementation patches, which is fantastic and well deserved in my opinion. -- regards, Kalle Sommer Nielsen kalle@php.net