Re: Request for karma to vote on RFCs
| From: | Andreas Heigl | Date: | Tue, 20 Jul 2021 09:14:15 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Request for karma to vote on RFCs | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-115515@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hey Jordan, Hey All.
Am 20.07.21 um 10:07 schrieb Jordan LeDoux:
> Another aspect that I thought about after reading your draft was a way to
> structurally avoid concerns about stacking. I don't believe that there
> would necessarily be overt efforts to grant karma to individuals to push
> certain concerns to the side, however it might be worth considering if the
> process could promote a variety of opinions and backgrounds. Even if such a
> situation were considered unlikely, it could be worth writing such a
> process with that in mind if the process involves a sponsor.
>
> As I said earlier, it makes sense for many reasons to require a sponsor to
> get voting karma, however this may unnecessarily make the applicant
> associated with their sponsor or their sponsor's history and contributions
> (which could be a positive or negative to one person or the other). It also
> makes it less likely that a perspective which is totally unrepresented gets
> sponsored. This could also be a positive thing, as not all perspectives are
> truly relevant or constructive to all the processes. But it might be worth
> considering these impacts explicitly.
>
> It's also worth considering if people believe that this is a process that
> will be iterated on or if there is a desire to get it right the first time
> and stick with it. Perhaps if the intent is to iterate, or at least
> explicitly revisit the criteria, the RFC could include an expiration at
> which time a vote to either keep or change the process could be held, which
> gives everyone clarity and certainty about the structure over a given
> period.
>
> Those are my immediate thoughts on your rough draft.
I've incorporated the changes into a PR
https://github.com/heiglandreas/rfc/pull/1/files
and also added these
concerns to the PR description.
Either I'll see to it to incorporate them or if someone else wants to
create a PR to discuss those concerns I'd be happy as well.
Cheers
Andreas
--
,,,
(o o)
+---------------------------------------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo-+
| Andreas Heigl |
| mailto:andreas@heigl.org N
50°22'59.5" E 08°23'58" |
| https://andreas.heigl.org
|
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| https://hei.gl/appointmentwithandreas
|
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature OpenPGP_signature.asc
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature OpenPGP_signature.asc