Re: Request for karma to vote on RFCs
| From: | Andreas Heigl | Date: | Mon, 19 Jul 2021 15:02:47 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Request for karma to vote on RFCs | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-115497@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hey All
Am 19.07.21 um 16:34 schrieb Levi Morrison via internals:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 2:38 AM Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 8:48 PM Tobias Nyholm <tobias.nyholm@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey.
>>> I would like to get karma to be able to vote on RFCs. I understand that
>>> voting karma isn’t usually given out to people who write their first
>>> mailing list entry.
>>>
>>> But I do believe I qualify as “Lead developers of PHP based projects
>>> (frameworks, cms, tools, etc.)”
>>
>> Hey Tobias,
>>
>> My response here is basically the same as the last time the topic came up:
>> https://externals.io/message/110936#110937 Voting is just
>> the very last
>> step of the RFC process, at which point the proposal can no longer be
>> influenced. If you have feedback about a proposal based on your extensive
>> experience in PHP's open source ecosystem, then the discussion phase is the
>> time to provide it, while it can still influence the proposal, as well as
>> other people's view of the proposal.
>
> I second this.
>
>> At least in my personal opinion, I think it's important that people granted
>> voting rights as community representatives have at least some historical
>> involvement in RFC discussions.
>
> I agree with this, but have no specific objection to granting Tobias
> voting karma, as this is underspecified; how long should they
> participate? What kinds of involvement are appropriate? Being
> underspecified is not really their fault, and I don't feel like it
> would be an abuse to grant them voting karma, but do think it would be
> an abuse to deny them voting karma indefinitely because "we" don't get
> around to specifying it. It should be less of a decision on a
> case-by-case basis and more of a checklist.
>
Sounds like we need an RFC to make it clearer how voting karma for the
RFC process will be granted in the future.
Looking forward to your inputs.
Cheers
Andreas
--
,,,
(o o)
+---------------------------------------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo-+
| Andreas Heigl |
| mailto:andreas@heigl.org N
50°22'59.5" E 08°23'58" |
| https://andreas.heigl.org
|
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| https://hei.gl/appointmentwithandreas
|
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature OpenPGP_signature.asc
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature OpenPGP_signature.asc