Re: Re: namespace separator ideas
| From: | David Zülke | Date: | Sun, 27 Nov 2005 00:35:09 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: namespace separator ideas | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-20613@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
If we rule out :::, it should be <- instead.
Foo:>bar:>Baz::getTest()->foo();
vs
Foo<-bar<-Baz::getTest()->foo();
The latter looks better to me. I'd still prefer
Foo:::bar:::Baz::getTest()->foo();
though.
- David
Am 27.11.2005 um 01:28 schrieb Eric Coleman:
I'd have to vote for either <- or :>. I perfer the later. \ is kinda crappy. Looks weird, as does %%. Looks like a mess. -- Eric Coleman On Nov 26, 2005, at 7:17 PM, Jasper Bryant-Greene wrote:Oliver Grätz wrote:-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.phpOliver Grätz schrieb:+1 for <- here. It makes namespace hierarchies resemble diagrams of the same hierarchies (like inheritance in UML). It also visually makes sense, isn't hard to type, and doesn't look like a smiley (like :> etc). --Jasper Bryant-Greene General Manager Album Limited +64 21 708 334 jasper@album.co.nz --PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.phpWhoops, forgot to add "%%":> <:: <- <: ..