Re: Re: namespace separator ideas

Enough with the nitpicking! It's almost (what timezones are you in?) weekend, have a beer you guys! ;) Ron ""Oliver Grätz"" <oliver.graetz@arcor.de> schreef in bericht news:5C.86.14828.3BC40934@pb1.pair.com... > Jani Taskinen schrieb: >>>This provided we support nested namespaces. Do we need them? >>> >>>JT>> No, we don't need no stinking namespaces. We already have >>>prefixes. :) >>> >>>Did I write the word "nested" in invisible font? Funny, I didn't know my >>>mail client supports it. >> >> Yes, but you don't have to think about "nested" if you forget >> namespaces. :) > > Nope. If you forget namespaces in that statement, then you have to think > ONLY about "nested", meaning questioning > > "This provided we support nested." > > which sheds another light on this. Why forget about nesting here and not > everywhere else? No more nested parentheses, no more nested for() loops, > no more nested if(). That's braindead! The concept of being able to nest > stuff is natural to programming. > > So, by trying to question namespaces at all, JT still answered the > nesting question ;-) > > OLLi