Re: namespace separator ideas

Sorry, did not notice you put a special meaning to +2, +1, etc. You can put a +2 for me for ":" and a +1 for ":::". Anyways, I'm tired of discussing this. I'm going to stick to ::: for now, and if constants are not wanted, I'll then go with ":". I have to work on some minor details of the patch, which are more important than this (I put the namespace separator in a #define, so it can easily be changed in the future). Regards, Jessie Jessie Hernandez wrote:

Great work, Oliver! I personally also add a +1 for ":", with the whitespace restriction in the ternary operator (or just removing namespace constants). I would also add another restriction: you cannot more than one point for/against (so no +2's or -2's, etc.). It just doesn't make sense (I might as well do +4000000 for whatever I want :-) ). Regards, Jessie