Re: Re: namespace separator ideas

+2 to <-, which, in my humble opinion, is more logic than anything else that was proposed (as mentionned earlier, it creates a sort of "hierachy"). \ and %% just seem too extravagant... -2 to them I guess. Just my 2 cents. On 11/26/05, Oliver Grätz <oliver.graetz@arcor.de> wrote: > > OK, I'll update the table. One moment... > I leave the +2 in and have added a -2 , which I didn't use as I didn't > want to pre-vote anyones comments so clearly. There should be 5 non-zero > values (as in ++/+/o/-/--, which is used in project-portfolio-planning), > as one can put some weighting into the answer. I suppose there won't be > anyone truely judging by this table but I clearly lost the overview so > this is a way of ruling out some candidates. > > OLLi > > > > First update: > > Namespace Operators > > > ======================================================================================================================== > Name |s| %% | : | ::: | ::< | :< | <- | :> | \ | > -> | \\ | <:: | <: | .. | | | | > > > ---------------------+-+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ > Robert Deaton |-| +0 | | -1 | | | -2 | +1 | > | | | | | | | | | > Alan Knowles |-| | +1 | | | | | | > | | | | | | | | | > Greg Beaver |-| | +0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | | +0 | +0 | > +1 | +1 | +0 | +0 | | | | | > Jessie Hernandez |-| +1 | +1 | +2 | | | | | > | | | | | | | | | > Matt Friedman |-| | | -1 | | | +1 | | > -1 | | | +1 | +1 | | | | | > David Zülke |-| | | +2 | | | +1 | -1 | > | | | | -1 | | | | | > Oliver Grätz |*| +2 | | +1 | | | | | > | | | | | | | | | > Matthew C. Kavanagh |-| -1 | | | | | | | > | | | | | | | | | > Jasper Bryant-Greene |-| | | | | -1 | +1 | -1 | > | | | | -1 | | | | | > Eric Coleman |-| -1 | | | | | +1 | +1 | > -1 | | | | | | | | | > Christian Stocker |-| | | | | -1 | | -1 | > +1 | | | | -1 | | | | | > Stanislav Malyshev |-| | | | | | | | > | | | | | | | | | > Jared Williams |-| | | | | | | | | > +1 | | | | | | | | > Jason Garber | | | | | | | | | > | | | | | +1 | | | | > | | | | | | | | | > | | | | | | | | | > > > ---------------------+-+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ > sum | | +1 | +1 | +3 | +0 | -2 | +2 | -1 | -1 | > +2 | +1 | +1 | -2 | +1 | | | | > > > ======================================================================================================================== > > Notes: > - I took > +2 as "likes" > +1 as "is fine with" > +0 as "can live with" > -1 as "dislikes" > -2 as "hates" > empty for "no comment, no opinion, don't care" > - Please don't enter anything other than these values! > - The "s" column stands for "self-filled". I compiled the current > table from the comments in this newsgroup, so perhaps I didn't > get their comments right. > - The operators : <- -> could make big problems with the parser. > More complaints to follow. *g* > - Feel free to add new suggestions to the right. > - If you add your name at the bottom, please copy the free line > so the next one also has a free one. > - Do only edit the votes in *your* line! > - Correct the sums if you post. > - Please post as attachment! > > If some of the operators are definitely impossible to implement, > please put the headline of column in parentheses (as in "(<-)") > ans add a note why this operator can't be done (Hi Marcus *g*). > > > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- Nicolas Bérard Nault (nicobn@gmail.com) "Maybe nature is fundamentally ugly, chaotic and complicated. But if it's like that, then I want out." -- Steven Weinberg (prix Nobel de physique, 1979).