Re: namespace separator ideas

Great work, Oliver! I personally also add a +1 for ":", with the whitespace restriction in the ternary operator (or just removing namespace constants). I would also add another restriction: you cannot more than one point for/against (so no +2's or -2's, etc.). It just doesn't make sense (I might as well do +4000000 for whatever I want :-) ). Regards, Jessie Oliver Grätz wrote: > OK, you requested for it! *g* > > OLLi > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Namespace Operators > > ======================================================================================================================== > Name |s| %% | : | ::: | ::< | :< | <- | :> | \ | -> | > \\ | <:: | <: | .. | | | | > > ---------------------+-+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ > Robert Deaton |-| +0 | | -1 | | | -2 | +1 | | | | | > | | | | | > Alan Knowles |-| | +1 | | | | | | | | | | > | | | | | > Greg Beaver |-| | +0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | | +0 | +0 | +1 | +1 | +0 | +0 > | | | | | > Jessie Hernandez |-| +1 | | +2 | | | | | | | | | > | | | | | > Matt Friedman |-| | | -1 | | | +1 | | -1 | | | +1 | +1 > | | | | | > David Zülke |-| | | +2 | | | +1 | -1 | | | | | -1 > | | | | | > Oliver Grätz |*| +2 | | +1 | | | | | | | | | > | | | | | > Matthew C. Kavanagh |-| -1 | | | | | | | | | | | > | | | | | > Jasper Bryant-Greene |-| | | | | -1 | +1 | -1 | | | | | -1 > | | | | | > Eric Coleman |-| -1 | | | | | +1 | +1 | -1 | | | | > | | | | | > Christian Stocker |-| | | | | -1 | | -1 | +1 | | | | -1 > | | | | | > Stanislav Malyshev |-| | | | | | | | | | | | > | | | | | > Jared Williams |-| | | | | | | | | +1 | | | > | | | | | > Jason Garber | | | | | | | | | | | | | > | +1 | | | | > | | | | | | | | | | | | | > | | | | | > > ---------------------+-+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ > sum | | +1 | +1 | +3 | +0 | -2 | +2 | -1 | -1 | +2 | +1 | +1 | -2 > | +1 | | | | > > ======================================================================================================================== > > Notes: > - I took > +2 as "likes" > +1 as "is fine with" > +0 as "can live with" > -1 as "dislikes" > - The "s" column stands for "self-filled". I compiled the current > table from the comments in this newsgroup, so perhaps I didn't > get their comments right. > - The operators : <- -> could make big problems with the parser. > More complaints to follow. *g* > - Feel free to add new suggestions to the right. > - If you add your name at the bottom, please copy the free line > so the next one also has a free one. > - Do only edit the votes in *your* line! > - Correct the sums if you post. > - Please post as attachment! > > If some of the operators are definitely impossible to implement, > please put the headline of column in parentheses (as in "(<-)") > ans add a note why this operator can't be done (Hi Marcus *g*).