Re: Re: Labeled Breaks (not the G-word)

From:	Sander Steffann	Date:	Sun, 27 Nov 2005 16:01:54 +0000
Subject:	Re: Re: Labeled Breaks (not the G-word)
References:	1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8	Groups:	php.internals
Request:	Send a blank email to internals+get-20656@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message

Hi,

On Sun, 27 Nov 2005, Zeev Suraski wrote:
I'm not sold on reusing the break construct for that, since we're not really breaking, and I kind of like Ilia's "jump" idea. Another possibility would be reusing 'continue', which makes a bit more English sense, even though it's not very similar to continue's semantics.
    +1 for "jump", which I did suggest in the meeting. :)

I think this is the best option too. The name is a clear indication of what it does and no existing names are reused (this would give too much confusion IMHO). Just my HO though :-) Sander.