Re: Re: Labeled Breaks (not the G-word)
| From: | Zeev Suraski | Date: | Mon, 28 Nov 2005 08:36:12 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Labeled Breaks (not the G-word) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-20698@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I'm indifferent to adding the restricted goto, and against adding a full-featured goto. We can do well without either of them.
Zeev
At 02:27 28/11/2005, George Schlossnagle wrote:
me 3. goto is good. Wez Furlong wrote:me also On 11/27/05, Edin Kadribasic <edink@emini.dk> wrote:-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.phpIlia Alshanetsky wrote:If it comes down to count of +1/-1 about this feature, I am +1 for unrestricted forward/backward jumps and -1 for restricted version.I agree with this. Edin