Re: Re: Labeled Breaks (not the G-word)
| From: | John Coggeshall | Date: | Mon, 28 Nov 2005 20:11:11 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Labeled Breaks (not the G-word) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-20768@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
goto++
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 19:27 -0500, George Schlossnagle wrote:
> me 3.
>
> goto is good.
>
> Wez Furlong wrote:
>
> >me also
> >
> >
> >On 11/27/05, Edin Kadribasic <edink@emini.dk> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>If it comes down to count of +1/-1 about this feature, I am +1 for
> >>>unrestricted forward/backward jumps and -1 for restricted version.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>I agree with this.
> >>
> >>Edin
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>