Re: Re: Labeled Breaks (not the G-word)
| From: | Ron Korving | Date: | Tue, 29 Nov 2005 11:59:34 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Labeled Breaks (not the G-word) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-20820@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Exactly, I don't see why people are mixing up the two in this discussion. I
think everybody can agree that a labeled break would really add something to
PHP. goto is a totally different story that should be discussed parallel to
labeled break. It is _not_ the same thing and the two can co-exist just fine
if they have to.
Ron
"Stanislav Malyshev" <stas@zend.com> schreef in bericht
news:Pine.LNX.4.62.0511291341280.19526@shire.zend.office...
> LS>>"goto" aka "labeled break" construct is obviously needed quite
> LS>>dearly
> and
>
> But goto and labeled break is totally different. Labelled break is bound
> to a control structure and is a part of it. goto is not.
>
> --
> Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer
> stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ +972-3-6139665 ext.115