Re: [RFC] Starting 5.3
| From: | Marcus Boerger | Date: | Fri, 04 May 2007 19:44:13 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Starting 5.3 | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-29195@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hello Stanislav,
- you don't need a tool - well php - but hey you probbaly have that tool
- you can run phar archives out of the box - untouched
- you can extract phar archives and run them - still untouched
- you can provide phar archives that do not require a phar extension
To your question "is phar so important that everybody needs it in the
main source." I think the above means it should.
best regards
marcus
Friday, May 4, 2007, 9:36:22 PM, you wrote:
>> obsolete set of tools (autoconf-2.13, etc.). Having Phar in the main
>> distro will open up a whole new way to distribute PHP applications which
>> would be a great advantage. The current system of distributing a bunch
>> of PHP files has some shortcomings.
> I'm personally not sure phar is that great way of distributing apps -
> it's yet another format not supported by standard tools and I don't
> really see much of an advantage to using it versus just making a package
> with any of the existing package formats and I see a number of
> disadvantages - non-standard format, hard to work with packed scripts
> with available filesystem tools, etc. But that's my opinion and I fully
> expect some people to hold exactly the opposite opinion. The question is
> however is phar so important that everybody needs it in the main source?
> --
> Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer
> stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/
Best regards,
Marcus