Re: Re: [php-icu] Graphemes and unicode vs intl extension
| From: | Marcus Boerger | Date: | Fri, 21 Mar 2008 18:17:58 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [php-icu] Graphemes and unicode vs intl extension | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-36250@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hello Stanislav,
no, instead I think everything in those exts should have intl_ or Intl as
prefix. That works for Spl and SplTypes pretty well where I use Spl prefix
in SplTypes as well.
marcus
Friday, March 21, 2008, 6:52:52 PM, you wrote:
>> All functions in pecl/intl should therefore be named intl_foobar() and
>> classes intlFooBar in theory.
> Well, intl module as I mentioned is a bit different - it has functional
> parts which could be in fact separate extensions, but for practical
> reasons aren't. So leaving aside the collision with date, do you think
> it's be ok to have msgfmt_*, numfmt_* etc. prefixes?
> --
> Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect
> stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/
> (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com
Best regards,
Marcus