Re: Re: [php-icu] Graphemes and unicode vs intl extension
| From: | Friedhelm Betz | Date: | Fri, 21 Mar 2008 18:42:17 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [php-icu] Graphemes and unicode vs intl extension | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-36258@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi,
Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
As long time PHP user I was very happy about the coding-standards to prefix functions/classes with the corresponding ext-name, really. As user (for some reasons) I prefer the prefixing with intl_. However, as lurker, I know, my vote doesn't count ;-) Kind Regards FriedhelmAll functions in pecl/intl should therefore be named intl_foobar() and classes intlFooBar in theory.Well, intl module as I mentioned is a bit different - it has functional parts which could be in fact separate extensions, but for practical reasons aren't. So leaving aside the collision with date, do you think it's be ok to have msgfmt_*, numfmt_* etc. prefixes?