Re: [VOTE] [RFC] 2/3 vote needed (was: 64 bit platform improvements...)
| From: | Kris Craig | Date: | Sat, 17 May 2014 23:53:18 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [VOTE] [RFC] 2/3 vote needed (was: 64 bit platform improvements...) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-74322@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 6:30 AM, Daniel Convissor <
danielc@analysisandsolutions.com> wrote:
> Folks:
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:12:18AM +0200, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> > I think it still mandates a 66%+1 vote.
>
> Agreed. This is a major change.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> --Dan
>
> --
> T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y
> data intensive web and database programming
> http://www.AnalysisAndSolutions.com/
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
I agree that it should have been, but under the current language of the
voting RFC, it can also be reasonably interpreted to call for a simple
majority. The RFC author chose to go with simple majority and left it
there. Trying to change the requirement mid-vote would be far more
troubling, in my view. Instead, we should discuss clarifying that language
in the voting RFC so that the interpretation is not so subjective in the
future.
--Kris