Re: [VOTE] [RFC] 2/3 vote needed (was: 64 bit platform improvements...)

Hi, Let's reiterate this over... 66%+1 of voting members and not 66%+1 of core members. Is that right? I really want this to be fixed, because Annotations for 66%+1 of voting members, but not of core member and it got rejected. Just to make things sure... I don't wanna hear about meritocracy again. Cheers, On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Kris Craig <kris.craig@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 6:30 AM, Daniel Convissor < > danielc@analysisandsolutions.com> wrote: > > > Folks: > > > > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:12:18AM +0200, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > > > I think it still mandates a 66%+1 vote. > > > > Agreed. This is a major change. > > > > Sincerely, > > > > --Dan > > > > -- > > T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y > > data intensive web and database programming > > http://www.AnalysisAndSolutions.com/ > > > > -- > > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > > I agree that it should have been, but under the current language of the > voting RFC, it can also be reasonably interpreted to call for a simple > majority. The RFC author chose to go with simple majority and left it > there. Trying to change the requirement mid-vote would be far more > troubling, in my view. Instead, we should discuss clarifying that language > in the voting RFC so that the interpretation is not so subjective in the > future. > > --Kris > -- Guilherme Blanco MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com GTalk: guilhermeblanco Toronto - ON/Canada