RE: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] [RFC] 2/3 vote needed (was: 64 bit platform improvements...)
| From: | Zeev Suraski | Date: | Sun, 18 May 2014 08:28:38 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] [RFC] 2/3 vote needed (was: 64 bit platform improvements...) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-74332@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
*From:* Kris Craig [mailto:kris.craig@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Sunday, May 18, 2014 10:27 AM
*To:* Andreas Heigl
*Cc:* Zeev Suraski; guilhermeblanco@gmail.com; Daniel Convissor; Ferenc
Kovacs; Nikita Popov; PHP Internals
*Subject:* Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] [RFC] 2/3 vote needed (was: 64 bit platform
improvements...)
Can't we simply talk of 2/3 to avoid any confusion?
Agreed, especially considering that even 66.66% is technically inaccurate,
as is 66.66666666666%. It would be nice if the various character encodings
supported a repetend symbol somehow, but since they don't, 2/3 is really
the only sane way to express the requirement accurately.
Agreed as well. 2/3 is the language used by the current Voting RFC.