Re: cvs: phpweb / copyright.php license.html style.css /include layout.inc
| From: | Jim Winstead | Date: | Wed, 11 Apr 2001 18:26:48 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: cvs: phpweb / copyright.php license.html style.css /include layout.inc | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.mirrors |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-mirrors+get-4704@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 07:53:58PM +0200, Hojtsy Gabor wrote:
> > > (Plus I don't want some company making money off the work/time we've
> > > *donated* to developing the PHP site.)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> > i guess we differ here. i'm perfectly happy to see companies making
> > money off the time i've donated to the php effort.
> >
> > after all, i've made money off the time that everyone else has
> > donated.
>
> Colin says the PHP site, not php. Design, and programming
> from the php site should not be copied...
i think that distinction is specious. if someone wants to learn
something about designing a website from the php site, i say more
power to them. a license isn't going to stop the bozos who will
just clone the site, and i think it just confuses people who will
otherwise do the right thing.
> > > The code, text, PHP logo, and graphical elements on this website
> > > and the mirror websites (the "Site") are Copyright © 2001
> > > The PHP Group. All rights reserved.
> >
> > i'd prefer it say "apache software foundation" instead of "the php
> > group", if we're really looking to protect anything.
>
> What? Apache Software Foundation??? It seems missed something..
php is an apache software foundation project. "the php group"
is a rather tenuous designation that probably has very little
legal standing.
(and the asf is currently looking at securing trademarks for various
things. i've asked the board to look into securing a trademark on
the php logo. i doubt we would have any luck in protecting the
php name itself, and our own usage of the term is quite trademark
un-friendly to begin with. trademarks are a pain in the ass.)
jim