Re: cvs: phpweb / copyright.php license.html style.css /include layout.inc

From: Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 18:26:48 +0000
Subject: Re: cvs: phpweb / copyright.php license.html style.css /include layout.inc
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.mirrors 
Request: Send a blank email to php-mirrors+get-4704@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 07:53:58PM +0200, Hojtsy Gabor wrote: > > > (Plus I don't want some company making money off the work/time we've > > > *donated* to developing the PHP site.) > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > i guess we differ here. i'm perfectly happy to see companies making > > money off the time i've donated to the php effort. > > > > after all, i've made money off the time that everyone else has > > donated. > > Colin says the PHP site, not php. Design, and programming > from the php site should not be copied... i think that distinction is specious. if someone wants to learn something about designing a website from the php site, i say more power to them. a license isn't going to stop the bozos who will just clone the site, and i think it just confuses people who will otherwise do the right thing. > > > The code, text, PHP logo, and graphical elements on this website > > > and the mirror websites (the "Site") are Copyright © 2001 > > > The PHP Group. All rights reserved. > > > > i'd prefer it say "apache software foundation" instead of "the php > > group", if we're really looking to protect anything. > > What? Apache Software Foundation??? It seems missed something.. php is an apache software foundation project. "the php group" is a rather tenuous designation that probably has very little legal standing. (and the asf is currently looking at securing trademarks for various things. i've asked the board to look into securing a trademark on the php logo. i doubt we would have any luck in protecting the php name itself, and our own usage of the term is quite trademark un-friendly to begin with. trademarks are a pain in the ass.) jim

« previous php.mirrors (#4704) next »