Re: cvs: phpweb / copyright.php license.html style.css /include layout.inc
| From: | eschmid+sic at s dot netic dot de | Date: | Wed, 11 Apr 2001 21:00:01 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: cvs: phpweb / copyright.php license.html style.css /include layout.inc | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.mirrors |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-mirrors+get-4716@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 01:28:54PM -0700, Jim Winstead wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 08:58:17PM +0200, Egon Schmid (@work) wrote:
> > Colin Viebrock wrote:
> > >
> > > > actually, yes. that's why the manual is under the gpl. (and there
> > > > is at least one company doing this already.)
> > >
> > > Oh. I didn't know that.
> >
> > It's the PHP Manual in two volumes by Stig S[?]ther Bakken, Zeev
> > Suraski, Egon Schmid. Publisher iUniverse.com Incorporated, Pub. Date:
> > November 2000.
> >
> > This very old PDF manuals can be ordered via www.amazon.com or
> > www.bn.com.
> >
> > But it is not true that the manual is under the GPL so that every
> > publisher can publish the PHP manual. This company graps every manual
> > they can find and publish it, if it have the GPL.
>
> good for them.
Normally publisher pay the authors and print their names on the front
page.
> > Does any from the authors of the PHP manual get paid by iUniverse?
>
> no. as one of the authors, do i care? not at all
My motivation goes down to NULL. If I'm a publisher (which happens soon) I
haven't to share the incomings with the authors.
> do any of the authors of php itself get paid every time that red
> hat or suse or caldera or anyone else sells a cd with php on it? no.
> as one of the authors, do i care? not at all.
PHP is (at least PHP 3) Open Source Software and under the GPL. The PHP
manual is a different thing. It is not software.
> > The GPL was choosen by accident. It have been discussed already, that we
> > should switch ASAP to another more appropriate license.
>
> interesting application of "asap". i think i was the one who first
> raised the issue a couple of years ago.
And why haven't you changed them? Use the license for manuals from the
FSF or ask RMS which one is more appropriate.
> why did i raise it? so *more* publishers would print the manual,
> and hopefully contribute back to making the freely-available manual
> better, rather than paying yet another author to write the same
> basic material. (but not so that the contribution would become a
> requirement.)
You are too late, April the First is over.
-Egon
--
LinuxTag, Stuttgart, Germany: July 5-8 2001: http://www.linuxtag.de/
All known books about PHP and related books: http://php.net/books.php
Concert Band of the University of Hohenheim: http://www.concert-band.de/
First and second bestselling book in German: http://www.php-buch.de/