Re: Major package revisions

Heh, I was just thinking tonight that a socket based log interface would be good (so I can monitor my programs using a telnet client)... so if that could make it's way into 2.0, that would be nice :P Jon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jon Parise" <jon@php.net> To: <pear-dev@lists.php.net> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 5:27 AM Subject: [PEAR-DEV] Major package revisions > I'm working on a completely new Log package. It will not be backwards > compatible with the existing Log package but will boast a number of > new features and conveniences. > > That aside, I'm curious what the PEAR-preferred method is for > introducing a major revision of a package (this will be Log 2.0). I > was planning on branching off the existing code (to remain Log 1.x for > maintenance releases) and continuing the Log 2.x code in the HEAD > branch. > > Does the existing PEAR (web) infrastructure support the notion of > development branches? > > -- > Jon Parise (jon@php.net) :: The PHP Project (http://www.php.net/) > > -- > PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >