Re: Major package revisions
| From: | Jon Parise | Date: | Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:42:17 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Major package revisions | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-10198@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 06:50:13PM +0200, Martin Jansen wrote:
> > I wasn't so much wondering about the packaging tools as I was curious
> > whether having Log 1.x and Log 2.x both listed on the package
> > information page would confuse things. I guess the Log 2.x version
> > would always be considered the "newest" and be offered by default.
>
> That's right ;-). Apart from changing the package information I don't
> see a good solution for this, unfortunately.
I suppose one possible "solution" would be implementing a "branches"
system similar to Freshmeat's, but I doubt all that many packages
would really make use of it. Still, I wouldn't object if someone
were to implement such a feature. =)
--
Jon Parise (jon@php.net) :: The PHP Project (http://www.php.net/)