Re: Major package revisions

On Tue Oct 22, 2002 at 08:1753AM -0400, Jon Parise wrote: > On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 08:36:35AM +0200, Martin Jansen wrote: > > > > Does the existing PEAR (web) infrastructure support the notion of > > > development branches? > > > > No, it doesn't. But I also don't see the necessity for that: Just run > > "pear package" in the checked-out branch (no matter if this is HEAD or > > another one) and the right branch will be packaged. Or did I > > understand you wrong? > > I wasn't so much wondering about the packaging tools as I was curious > whether having Log 1.x and Log 2.x both listed on the package > information page would confuse things. I guess the Log 2.x version > would always be considered the "newest" and be offered by default. That's right ;-). Apart from changing the package information I don't see a good solution for this, unfortunately. -- - Martin Martin Jansen http://martinjansen.com/