Re: Major package revisions
| From: | Jon Parise | Date: | Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:17:53 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Major package revisions | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-10194@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 08:36:35AM +0200, Martin Jansen wrote:
> > Does the existing PEAR (web) infrastructure support the notion of
> > development branches?
>
> No, it doesn't. But I also don't see the necessity for that: Just run
> "pear package" in the checked-out branch (no matter if this is HEAD or
> another one) and the right branch will be packaged. Or did I
> understand you wrong?
I wasn't so much wondering about the packaging tools as I was curious
whether having Log 1.x and Log 2.x both listed on the package
information page would confuse things. I guess the Log 2.x version
would always be considered the "newest" and be offered by default.
--
Jon Parise (jon@php.net) :: The PHP Project (http://www.php.net/)