new template engine

On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Hojtsy Gabor wrote: > I do think, that making PEAR a kind of BinaryCloud is not > the thing people here wan't to do. PEAR should not be a single > framework, but insted as it essentially means a repository for Me neither. I never have seen PEAR as a framework but a collection of reusable components for common (and sometimes not so common) tasks. These components allready have speeded up my development time on various tasks. I also could use these components to build a framework of my own. Still, I really wouldn't want to see PEAR to change into a single framework. I thing one reason why there is so much emotions included in the postings in pear-dev and pear-general is that since old PEAR code was included in PHP distribution and the "new" PEAR code is still in the same CVS as PHP it is considered somehow "better" than other places. So someone wants to have his code included in this "official" distribution place. When the PEAR community says the code does not fit in that someone gets offended. IMO PEAR has been going to right direction as it is now. It is not a framework. It does not iclude any other frameworks. It does include usable and combatible pieces of code to help me work faster. How about doing something constructive for a while? -- Mika Tuupola http://www.appelsiini.net/~tuupola/