Re: LiveUser

Am Wed, 13 Nov 2002 12:00:32 +0100 schrieb "Lukas Smith" <smith@dybnet.de>: > > What do mean by "mapping of auth and perm containers"? > > Well I am talking about the issue of mapping ID's from an auth container > to an ID in the perm container. As discussed previously the goal is to > not have to require any modifications to the auth container. > > The solution: > 1) there is a table in the perm container with the following fields > (field names are not final at all yet): > auth_name | auth_id | perm_id > > auth name: > will be an arbitrary name given to an auth container in the xml conf > file (or if none is given it will use the dsn or something like that) > > auth_id: > this will be the id returned by the auth container > > perm_id: > this will be the id used within the perm container Ah, I thought we already had something like that. Must have been wishful thinking :-) > 2) optionally the auth container can ask the perm container to generate > a new id. Then no mapping is required. Nah, I like 1) better. Regards, Markus -- *21st Media* | Consulting, Konzeption, Produktion für die Bereiche: Markus Wolff | Internet, Intranet, eCommerce, Content Management, Hamburg,Germany | Softwareentwicklung, 3D-Animation, Videostreaming http://21st.de | Tel. [+49](0)40/6887949-0, Fax: [+49](0)40/6887949-1