Re: Re: ext/imagick BC break (was: Re: [PEAR-DEV] PHP Magick version 0.5a Released!)
| From: | George Schlossnagle | Date: | Tue, 26 Nov 2002 16:02:08 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: ext/imagick BC break (was: Re: [PEAR-DEV] PHP Magick version 0.5a Released!) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-11115@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
See my previous mail. If time is the only reason not to do it, I'll be happy to do that part of the work, or show someone how.
Christian Stocker wrote:
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 16:38, George Schlossnagle wrote:Since you're breaking BC, have you considered making the new imagick interface OO? There is enormous bloat in the php global function table, keepinf all your method names in a private namespace would be nice.I have considered it back then when I wrote my implementation, but my Zend-Skills were pretty low back then and there are not many extensions which use that approach (domxml in a somehow quite strange way and ming), so I couldn't "steal" from others. The problem nowadays is, that I don't have time to rewrite it in OO fashion, therefore I think, we just have to leave it as it is... chreg