Re: Re: ext/imagick BC break (was: Re: [PEAR-DEV] PHP Magick version 0.5a Released!)

Hi Michael as far as I know, we could provide both methods in one extension (domxml does that somehow), it still does bloat the global function table of php, but people who want to use it in OO can use it and people who don't like it, don't have to use it. I would say, we take your code as it is and will add OO support maybe later. There aren't that many advantages of OO over procedural in case of imagick, therefore I don't think it's worth the effort to change it right now. > 2) are the savings/advantages so great that it's worth saying this version > was just a fun experiment to make sure it can be done and now let's write > it OO and release? hell no :) If we do OO, we don't have to change that much in your code. The main stuff could stay as it is. chregu