Re: PHPod documentation
| From: | Jon Parise | Date: | Tue, 31 Jul 2001 14:18:07 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PHPod documentation | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-1191@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 02:44:16PM +0200, Stig S. Bakken wrote:
> But these two systems have slightly different markup syntaxes, JavaDoc
> has metadata markup, while POD has formatting markup. What about
> combining the two into PHPod:
>
> we could easily document function parameters etc. with a POD-like format
> too, and and a bonus we would not inherit all the features from JavaDoc
> that don't really fit too well with PHP, but we can define a format that
> is perfect for PHP. What about this:
Hmm... I'm not sure which idea I like best here, considering all
of the ramifications of each.
I'm sort of leaning toward developing our own PearDoc system that
is based on the existing PHPDoc / JavaDoc syntax (because of
legacy code and familiarity), but I would really like to see the
capabilities of POD-style documentation be added, too.
So I think the thing to do is create a PearDoc standard that is a
superset of JavaDoc (while ignoring some of the irrelevant tags)
and includes the most helpful features of POD (but not
necessarily the POS syntax itself).
--
Jon Parise (jon@csh.rit.edu) . Rochester Inst. of Technology
http://www.csh.rit.edu/~jon/ : Computer Science House
Member