Re: PHPod documentation

Quoting Jon Parise <jon@php.net>: > I'm sort of leaning toward developing our own PearDoc system that > is based on the existing PHPDoc / JavaDoc syntax (because of > legacy code and familiarity), but I would really like to see the > capabilities of POD-style documentation be added, too. For those of us who've never used POD, maybe if someone were to explain what those (the capabilities of POD-style documentation) are, it would help? > So I think the thing to do is create a PearDoc standard that is a > superset of JavaDoc (while ignoring some of the irrelevant tags) > and includes the most helpful features of POD (but not > necessarily the POS syntax itself). I'm going to bump investigating the current phpdoc tools (people have been mentioning phpDocumentor(?) as being good?) and setting something up on the PEAR site to display docs of all of the classes to near the top of my priorities. We can go from there? -chuck -- Charles Hagenbuch, <chuck@horde.org> Some fallen angels have their good reasons.