Re: PHPod documentation
| From: | Tomas V.V.Cox | Date: | Tue, 31 Jul 2001 23:07:24 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PHPod documentation | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-1204@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Chuck Hagenbuch wrote:
>
> Quoting "Tomas V.V.Cox" <cox@idecnet.com>:
>
> > > > I say improve upon phpdoc (such as clearly state every possible
> > > > tag and its syntax) and forget about POD.
> >
> > We all agree, the problem is: where is the brave man that will do that?
>
> I'm volunteering; it's important to enough things that I'm working on that I
> need to see it happen. I'm moving this week, though, so no _immediate_ promises.
>
Nice to hear that Chuck. Here I send you a "concept patch" I sent Ulf
time ago for supporting functions mixed with classes and multiple
classes per file (one of the limitations of PHPDoc), hope it helps. Also
if you finally pick up this work I could help writing a php script (like
the pear script) for making the generation of the apidoc an easiest
work.
Tomas V.V.Cox