Re: Javascript repository or package for PEAR

Hi, Wolfram Kriesing schrieb:

Michael Bretterklieber wrote:

-1, IMO it would be better to have javascript for each package in their own directory structure. At the moment, it looks like every special files like js or images will end up in a data directory upon installation. Have a look at HTML_TreeMenu.

In my case I have javascript-functions for md5, sha1, base64, md4 and some others like bin2hex, I can imagine that these functions can also be useful for other packages in the future, or not?

well, since we are developing mostly for web, js is always something that goes with our developments. and packages like HTML_TreeMenu have their own JS. i am saying that because i also have a huge js-api, which can do kinda window management and moveable objects, etc. but i never suggested it to pear, since pear doesnt seem to be a js-place. but if the A in PEAR means application, we may be give it a thought. shall JS go in pear too, i am talking about js-pacakges ... i hope people wont flame me, since we Its obvious, that we don't make JS development (I think that there sould be never standalone JS-packages in PEAR), but I'm sure that there will be packages wich uses the same JS.

I think instead of copying the same JS-code into each package its better to have them on one place.

are in a php-env, which is more the backend. but i think those things can not be seperated anymore. you are right, if you would like to make web-apps user-friendly you have to use JS.

bye, -- ------------------------------- ---------------------------------- Michael Bretterklieber - Michael.Bretterklieber@jawa.at JAWA Management Software GmbH - http://www.jawa.at Liebenauer Hauptstr. 200 -------------- privat ------------ A-8041 GRAZ GSM: ++43-(0)676-84 03 15 712 Tel: ++43-(0)316-403274-12 E-mail: michael@bretterklieber.com Fax: ++43-(0)316-403274-10 http://www.bretterklieber.com ------------------------------- ---------------------------------- "...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected..." - Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972