Re: name for "new" IT[X] package: HTML_Template_ReIT

It may just be me, but I really don't like the proposed name HTML_Template_ReIT. It seems illogical and unprofessional to declare a package a rewrite of another existing package, when the existing one is currently in use. The name suggests that it is a replacement for the current system. Maybe I'm not understanding this thread at all, but I thought this proposed package was an alternative to be used by choice, not a replacement? Adam > On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 15:55:06 +0100 > LIMBOURG Arnaud <arnaud.limbourg@cegetel.fr> wrote: > >> Is it going to be a second package after all ? > > It seems he does not want to collaborate. That's all. > > If people agree to add this package in PEAR, well, I rather prefer to do > not think about that, keeping in mind the recent discussion about PFC, > CPAN like, and so on. > > Besides that, work will be done in IT as I said in the last thread about > IT, as conclusion. > > pierre > > -- > PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php --------------------------------------------------------------------- Adam Morton Developer - Electronic Student Services http://phpwebsite.appstate.edu Founder - Appalachian Linux Users Group http://alug.appstate.edu