Re: [Draft] Pear web
| From: | Vincent Blavet | Date: | Wed, 15 Aug 2001 13:16:02 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [Draft] Pear web | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-1489@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tomas V.V.Cox" <cox@idecnet.com>
To: "Stig Sæther Bakken" <ssb@alltheweb.com>
Cc: "PEAR DEV" <pear-dev@lists.php.net>
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: [PEAR-DEV] [Draft] Pear web
> Stig Sæther Bakken wrote:
> >
> > ["Tomas V.V.Cox" <cox@idecnet.com>]
> > > Stig Sæther Bakken wrote:
> > > >
> >
> > > For my tests I did a "make create" under pearweb/sql, but the tables
> > > there, are not the same as the ones at pear.php.net :-? What am I
doing
> > > wrong?
> >
> > Probably because the database on pear.php.net is a bit old, I'll do a
> > round of "make destroy" and "make create".
>
> I see you have made the "make create" and met with my problem: Unknown
> column
> 'packages.placeholder' in 'field list'. What is that column?
>
>
> > > > > |Download all packages|
> > > >
> > > > For downloading more than one package at once, we need a bundling
> > > > mechanism. Maybe use a different extension, such as .mtz for
> > > > "multiple tar/gz files", and then the installer can handle the rest.
> > >
> > > Very easy to detect, good idea. The format? A simple tar with tgz's?
Or
> > > should we build a meta-data xml file describing its contents also?
> >
> > We could define a generic "manifest" (file listing++) XML format for
> > both the .tgz and .mtz files, since the tar format does not have such
> > an index. This should wait until the installer uses a built-in tar
> > implementation though.
>
> Vincent, do you need help? I haven't see your commit to experimental
> yet.
>
Tomas,
I still not have any write access to cvs.php.net. I can access it with
cvsread read-only access so it is not a wincvs problem.
I send a mail to Stig, no news yet. I will re-send an official form on
php.net and I will wait for a login/password.
Vincent
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > url: pear.php.net/packages/category.php?idcat=X
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > search: |_______|
> > > > >
> > > > > NET category
> > > > >
> > > > > Packages:
> > > > >
> > > > > |*| _Net_CheckIP-1.1_ summary
> > > > > |Download| |View Doc| |View Source|
> > > > > |*| _Net_NNTP-1.3_ summary
> > > > > |Download| |View Doc| |View Source|
> > > > > |*| _Net_Ping-1.4_ summary
> > > > > |Download| |View Doc| |View Source|
> > > >
> > > > Wouldn't this just be part of the "package space" browser?
> > >
> > > When I enter to a site for the first time I click every where, but
when
> > > it's my 100th time I prefer direct access to things. With this and two
> > > clicks I could check the doc on-line, quick download what I know that
> > > need or check the source. And why not, we have enought empty space
> > > there.
> >
> > You're right. But we don't need to add the term "category" into
> > this.
>
> No matter, but why not category? What's the appropiate term?
>
> > > > > |Download all "Net" packages| |Download selected packages|
> > > > >
> > > > > Leyend:
> > > > > - Red packages means Experimental State
> > > >
> > > > Using colors is a good idea, but we need more than just
> > > > "experimental". At least "stable" releases should be easily
> > > > visible
> > > > as such, and I'd like to see "alpha", "beta" and
> > > > "development" or
> > > > "snapshot" states too.
> > >
> > > Make standar package state flags in the package.xml would help a lot
> > > (ie. <Package State="">). Or was selected a convention yet?
> >
> > Whoops! State is an attribute of a _release_, not of the package
> > itself. For example, if "DB 2.x" is under development, the 2.0
> > pre-releases will be labelled experimental or whatever, while the 1.x
> > releases are stable.
>
> Whoops''! Seems that the package.dtd needs a urgent update. I'll add
> this to Common. In the other hand want to do with the changelog? In the
> past I was against of leaving the changelog in the package.xml, but now
> guess that it will make things easier for us. What about:
>
> <Releases>
> <Release>
> <Version>1.1</Version>
> <State>(alpha|beta|devel|stable|cvs)</State>
> <Date>2002-1-1</Date>
> <Notes>blah</Notes>
> </Release>
> </Releases>
>
>
> The first release of devel/stable found while parsing will be the values
> to fill in develrelease/stablerelease columns of packages table.
>
> As the database seems to support also multiple authors I'll add it to
> Common also:
> <Maintainers>
> <Maintainer>
> <Initials>
> <Name>
> <Email>
> <Role>('lead', 'developer', 'contributor',
> 'helper')</Role>
> <Maintainer>
> </Maintainers>
>
>
> Sorry but I'll come back with more things :-)
>
>
> Tomas V.V.Cox
>
> --
> PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: pear-dev-unsubscribe@lists.php.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: pear-dev-help@lists.php.net
> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net
>
>