multiple releases (was: Re: [PEAR-DEV] [Draft] Pear web)
| From: | Tomas V.V.Cox | Date: | Wed, 15 Aug 2001 17:01:59 +0000 |
| Subject: | multiple releases (was: Re: [PEAR-DEV] [Draft] Pear web) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-1494@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
"Tomas V.V.Cox" wrote:
>
> Stig Sæther Bakken wrote:
> >
> > ["Tomas V.V.Cox" <cox@idecnet.com>]
> >
>In the other hand want to do with the changelog? In the
> past I was against of leaving the changelog in the package.xml, but now
> guess that it will make things easier for us. What about:
>
> <Releases>
> <Release>
> <Version>1.1</Version>
> <State>(alpha|beta|devel|stable|cvs)</State>
> <Date>2002-1-1</Date>
> <Notes>blah</Notes>
> </Release>
> </Releases>
>
>
> The first release of devel/stable found while parsing will be the values
> to fill in develrelease/stablerelease columns of packages table.
>
Umm, I met me with a problem here. What release should choose the
packager? I guess we shouldn't mix the release tag with the chagelog.
<Release> //or perhaps <Current>?
(version|state|date|notes)
</Release>
<Changelog>
<Release>
(version|state|date|notes)
</Release>
</Changelog>
Tomas V.V.Cox