package space naming (was: [Draft] Pear web)

["Tomas V.V.Cox" <cox@idecnet.com>] > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > url: pear.php.net/packages/category.php?idcat=X > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > search: |_______| > > > > > > > > > > NET category > > > > > > > > > > Packages: > > > > > > > > > > |*| _Net_CheckIP-1.1_ summary > > > > > |Download| |View Doc| |View Source| > > > > > |*| _Net_NNTP-1.3_ summary > > > > > |Download| |View Doc| |View Source| > > > > > |*| _Net_Ping-1.4_ summary > > > > > |Download| |View Doc| |View Source| > > > > > > > > Wouldn't this just be part of the "package space" browser? > > > > > > When I enter to a site for the first time I click every where, but when > > > it's my 100th time I prefer direct access to things. With this and two > > > clicks I could check the doc on-line, quick download what I know that > > > need or check the source. And why not, we have enought empty space > > > there. > > > > You're right. But we don't need to add the term "category" into > > this. > > No matter, but why not category? What's the appropiate term? I guess we could narrow it and use "PEAR category". Works better than "domain", "virtual package" or anything else I've come up with so far. :-) - Stig -- Stig Sæther Bakken <ssb@alltheweb.com> Fast Search & Transfer ASA, Trondheim, Norway