Re: [REMINDER][RfC] Net_ICQ
| From: | Ivan Stojic | Date: | Wed, 16 Jul 2003 20:22:30 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [REMINDER][RfC] Net_ICQ | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-18314@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 22:14:06 +0200, Martin Jansen wrote:
> On Wed Jul 16, 2003 at 10:0949PM +0200, Ivan Stojic wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 21:33:30 +0200, Martin Jansen wrote:
> > > I remember having looked at Net_ICQ in CPAN [1] and even if I don't like
> > > comparing CPAN code to PEAR packages, it seems as if the Perl version
> > > can do much more than your code. It for example supports different
> > > servers while your code is bound to *.icq.com. Apart from that they seem
> > > to have a more generic interface to utilize the different features like
> > > sending messages, searching users etc.
> > >
> > > Perhaps it's worth having a look at those things before releasing it in
> > > PEAR.
> >
> > Martin, I think you are missing the key point. The Net::ICQ in CPAN is
> > a full fledged ICQ client. The client that Tobias wrote and is
> > interested in publishing isn't.
>
> Then he should rename is class to Net_ICQ_Something, because otherwise
> it will be absolutely misleading.
Net_ICQ_Lite, like Alexander suggested sounds cool to me. I think that
in this case using _Lite is a good thing because this class cannot be
further extended - it is complete the way it is.
Just my $1/50 ;)