Re: [REMINDER][RfC] Net_ICQ

On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 22:22, Ivan Stojic wrote: > Net_ICQ_Lite, like Alexander suggested sounds cool to me. I think that > in this case using _Lite is a good thing because this class cannot be > further extended - it is complete the way it is. > > Just my $1/50 ;) > +1 for Net_ICQ_Lite -- Mirco 'meebey' Bauer PGP-Key: http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x5051C9B9 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GIT d s-: a--- C++ UL++>++++ P L++$>+++$ E W+++$ N o? K- w++>! O- M- V? PS PE+ Y- PGP>++ t 5+ X++ R tv+ b+ DI? D+ G>++ e h! r>++ y? ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------