Re: Alphaworks for PEAR
| From: | Greg Beaver | Date: | Thu, 14 Aug 2003 19:16:41 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Alphaworks for PEAR | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-19778@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 14:56:36 -0400 Greg Beaver <greg@chiaraquartet.net> wrote:GregI do think that the PEAR package is an approved package, last time I checked :). Of course, that cvs is in php-src/pear."Alphaworks/username" is a bad idea at all. imho. Even while thinking to restrict this usage only to PEAR itself. This is a pain enough to work with branches and sync our work without breaking anything. PHP is far bigger than pear and everyone use their own host to provide some experimental stuffs. That works like a charm. pierre OK, but we are literally on the verge of release a fork of PEAR at phpdoc.org that has the publicweb role so that people can install phpDocumentor. As far as I know, there are no public forks of the Zend engine, and this is the equivalent. Incidentally, what version numbers can we safely use to ensure that there will be no conflicts with future PEAR versions? can I call it PEAR version 1.2pl1, and add a HUGE warning that this is not official? I'll use release state snapshot.